Data Report

The State of Dental IT (Q2 2026)

In one sentence

A quarterly headline / monthly snapshot of dental IT health, drawn from a corpus of 100,000+ real dental support tickets. Methodology-transparent: every figure is either verified-and-aggregate, or rendered as an em-dash until the ledger clears it. The point of this report is that it is true.

Last updated

8 min read Published
reportdatamethodologydental rmmstate of dental it

This is the first edition of The State of Dental IT, a quarterly headline / monthly snapshot drawn from a corpus of 100,000+ real dental IT support tickets and the live signals from practices participating in the CyberCore early-access cohort.

Methodology, plainly

Every figure on this page is either (a) drawn from anonymized, aggregate cuts of the ticket corpus or live cohort with no practice-level identifiers retained, or (b) deliberately shown as an em-dash (—) because we have not yet verified it to a standard we will publish.

We do not publish "directional" or "estimated" numbers. If a figure is in the verified-figure ledger, it appears here. If it is not, the slot stays empty. The point of this report is that it is true.

What is in the verified-figure ledger today

At time of first publication, the ledger contains: (operator to populate; see TBD-F in the GEO execution plan). Subsequent monthly snapshots add new ledger entries as the aggregation pipeline clears them.

Headline findings (Q2 2026)

How often does dental software actually crash?

Cohort Dental-software exit events / endpoint / month Of those, % classified as real crash
All early-access endpoints
Endpoints running Dentrix
Endpoints running Eaglesoft
Endpoints running Open Dental

What share of those crashes were resolved without a human?

The autonomous-remediation path resolved —% of crashes within — seconds (p50) across the early-access cohort. Hardware-induced failures, which still require a human, are excluded from the autonomous-resolvable denominator.

How does dental compare to generic SMB IT?

Dental practices exhibit a characteristic failure profile that generic SMB-IT benchmarks do not capture: a high concentration of incidents in two narrow windows (operatory open and mid-day clinical block), and a heavy dependence on three to five vertical-specific applications. The Q2 corpus shows —% of dental incidents map to those vertical applications, versus a benchmark of —% for non-dental SMB IT.

Security findings (Q2 2026)

What share of dental security incidents involve a vendor remote-access account?

This is the most operationally important finding in the corpus, and the one we are most conservative about publishing. The number is in pre-verification review and will appear in the next monthly snapshot once aggregation tooling has cleared it. Until then: .

Patch-induced incidents

A meaningful share of dental incidents are caused by IT itself - specifically, generic patch policies applied to dental workstations without testing against dental imaging stacks. The Q2 rate is —% of total incidents, by the cohort-pooled count.

What we will not publish

  • Practice-level identifiers, even in aggregate cuts. If a number could deanonymize a single practice in the cohort, we do not publish it.
  • Comparisons against named competitors using telemetry the competitor did not consent to us aggregating.
  • Figures we cannot reproduce from the underlying queries. Each headline above maps to a stored query in our analytics workspace; future editions will link to a public methodology appendix.

How to read this report

If a figure shows as an em-dash, it is not "unknown" or "embarrassing" - it is being held until the verification pass clears. This is the same discipline we apply to our product UI: a posture score we cannot verify renders as , not as a mock. Same here.

Cadence

Quarterly headlines (this report) publish in March, June, September, December. Monthly snapshots publish on the first business day of each month and update the per-section figures in place, with the prior month archived under /blog/state-of-dental-it/[year]-[month].

What is in next month's snapshot

  • First verified-figure entry for the "vendor-remote-access incident share" headline.
  • Per-application breakdown of exit-event rates with confidence intervals.
  • An aggregate cut of the time-of-day incident distribution.

If you operate a dental practice and want to participate in the early-access cohort (and contribute anonymized signal to future editions of this report), email hello@cybercore.one.

Ask Core AI